is committed to building software products that are easy to use,
effective and designed for engineers,
to efficiently resolve engineering challenges.
high in the value chain
as a strategic partner and solution provider
our philosophy is built around
value added services & solutions and not entry level solutions
CAD (Computer Aided Design) has a rich history of over 50 years. Computer Aided Design Software aided the engineering industry to produce designs, specifications, models and drawings for mechanical parts and assemblies. The advantages of quality, accuracy and precision provided by CAD systems helped the entire design process to speed up. Parametric features-based CAD software solutions provide a lot of power and help to automate some of the engineering processes involved in product development.
Mechanical engineering software tools (CAD and CAE) locates flaws and troubleshoots problems that engineers would otherwise only discover after production. Additionally, the tools can also simulate how a prototype would function in certain environments, including extreme environments which would be difficult to replicate in the real world.
Over the years, CAD engineers are looking for capabilities and features that suit the needs of specific industries. They are now looking for more advanced features like design automation, process automation, optimization tools, validation tools, etc.
CEAD – Engineering Design Synthesis
CEAD is based on our new innovative “Engineering Design Synthesis” methodology which allows design engineers to try out different ideas in the conceptual design phase and hence equipping them with the creative freedom to design innovative products. It provides an ideal platform to synthesize design in the pre-CAD stage. CEAD also helps in reducing the product design cycle time and cost as it reduces the costly iterations between CAD and CAE tools later in the design cycle. It is possible because CEAD helps in starting your 3d models with better initial values. Read More
For sample illustration videos please visit our YouTube page
CADVision assess the need of custom solution by providing consulting services and develops application that well integrates into current environment
Our main expectation was to achieve flexible, effective support that would help us minimizing the time-to-market for our software products at a reasonable cost. Talking about "building a partnership" is somewhat a cliché in our business. But, it is simply a reality with CADVision. Obviously we have written contracts and agreements, but the real point is that we share goals and we trust each other
Sergio SalsedoCEO, Focus PLM, Italy
Our approach to NPD (New Product Development) is very process driven and TIRC is happy to have found a business partner in CAD Vision at the appropriate time. The CEAD tool had helped our engineers work at a faster pace with reduced repetitive work on analytics. We have started using this tool on many more projects and have seen that the team has adapted well to it.
Dr. Krishna PrasadExecutive Director, Terex India R&D Center
We were not looking for simple manpower that is usually very unstable, but a team that could really be a true value add to our development efforts. This is a vision that we shared with CADVision at the start and they have been able to deliver on that. we are able to speak directly with the people that actually do the work rather than with multiple layers of management. In this case smaller with good quality is definitely better.
Tom DavisCEO, Solair, Italy
We had to do lot of force calculations and moment conversion during the process using excel based methods. If we had used the conventional approach, it would have been very tedious and time consuming. We appreciate vectors functionality in CEAD which made it easy for us to do the force calculations. It also dynamically updated of calculations and results on change of geometry. We can study the effect of changing any independent variable and plot graphs, analyze and conclude on the best possible geometry. We validated the results and found the results obtained by CEAD were very close to results obtained by ADAMS and FEA.
We have been looking for a replacement to Excel as it is not the best tool for engineering design. The conventional approach was non-optimal. By using CEAD we were able to synthesize the geometry by utilizing various features of CEAD like geometric constraints, vectors, simulation and optimization. Geometric visualization of design is one among the various advantages of CEAD over Excel.